flaggroup

Business Development and Licensing Journal:

Issue 8 - Spring 2009

BDLJ cover 8

Now we have reached almost the mid point of 2009, the predicted title of “The Year of Consolidation” for 2009, appears to be on course for fulfilling its potential. Two very major mergers and the at last successful completion of the Roche Genentech deal, signals the next stage of internal reviews, integration committees and the inevitable job losses, as recovery of costs work their way through. Many companies have been trimming their sales forces but when key departments such as IP begin to adopt percentage cuts in headcount, then it is evident that the impact of the recession is going very deep.

The Merck-Schering-Plough merger signals a departure for Merck which up until now has been one of the few top companies who have been able to hold its position, essentially on organic growth. Investors have approved of the Merck-Schering-Plough deal; Merck stock gained 23%[its biggest two-day gain ever] the two-day rally adding more than $10.8 billion to Merck’s market cap. This was of course helped by good news – The Lancet published data favourable to Schering’s anticlotting drug candidate TRA and analysts are calling the company a “best-in-class grower.” The key question however remains – will this consolidation activity improve innovation?

At the other end of the scale, the merger activity between biotechs and SMEs may ensure short term survival, but it seems salutary that we are this year celebrating the 200 anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin – survival of the fittest is an appropriate epithet. The funding crisis is not expected to improve until late 2010 or 2011 and so surviving calls for great sacrifices. The cost of acquiring investment has changed significantly. Securing an investment of say $5-20 million a year ago, may have cost around 50% equity, but gaining the same investment may now require a release of up to 90% of equity. Burrill are quoted as saying, “The capital markets are always open, but the availability and price have changed.”

Interesting times indeed!

Sharon Finch

Editor

Contents:

Strategic options for getting the most out of late-stage licensing deals
Sarah Hanson, Partner, CMS Cameron McKenna LLP
Ian Scoular, Director of Business Development, Protherics Ltd

In the current pharma and biotech environment companies are facing declining growth, meaning that a number of options to deliver shareholder value have to be considered. These can include consolidation activities such as mergers, acquisitions and alliances, but also nearer term licensing of late-stage opportunities. Opportunities are evolving with the demand for deals remaining high.

The current macroeconomic situation also supports deal making. Big pharma share prices are strong, and are seen as defensive stocks by analysts and these companies still have substantive cash piles. They have a need for new products in the light of the impending ‘patent cliff’ in 2010-2012 and opportunities are looking relatively inexpensive with the credit crunch.

Companies who do decide to enhance shareholder value by carrying out nearer term licensing or entering into collaborative agreements must consider a number of issues when entering into such arrangements. Specifically the parties will need to bear in mind that the focus in a late-stage licence differs to that for an early-stage deal in that there will be a much greater focus on the marketing and promotional aspects of the product. Also, the parties need to think about factors outside of the contractual arrangements as between the licensor and licensee to ensure that the market potential for the product is fully realised.

Trends in the therapeutic area focus of leading pharmaceutical companies
John Ansell, John Ansell Consultancy

Insight into how the therapeutic area focus of a pharma company’s late-stage R & D is changing can be valuable for licensing and other pharma industry professionals. How can we expect the therapeutic direction of leading pharmaceutical companies to change over the next few years as their new products emerge onto the market? And how does this compare with the situation five years ago? As well as examining changes within the Top 20 companies, this article draws some overall conclusions.

Royalty recovery and audits
Raja Sengupta, Equal IP

Audit processes and procedures arise as a consequence of the royalty returns and payments (or the lack of such) that are made under licence agreements on a regular basis. The specific terms of the audit and the rights to access the relevant documents should be set out in the licence in fairly precise detail however when this is not the case, this then gives rise to uncertainty on the rights.

Managing and motivating negotiators
Andrew Gottschalk, Group AG

The starting point of this paper is the assertion that it is essential to align the management and motivation of the negotiator with the long-term strategic objectives of the organisation for which they work. In comparison with the financial services business development executives in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector may allow themselves a slight sense of superiority but we cannot ignore that we have also made mistakes that may have had serious consequences. If we use long-term satisfaction of the partners with their deal a thirty percent rating is not good news! In these turbulent economic times we might be naive enough to claim that individual and organisational negotiating competencies can and should make a small but significant strategic contribution to a company’s competitive position and performance. However, when you next visit a bookshop you will find a number of books on negotiating but one that is conspicuous by its absence is a slim volume containing practical insights on how to manage and motivate negotiators. Their anxious and stressful time spent “getting to yes” does not appear merit a space on the bookshelf. Clearly they are perceived “self starters,” the organizational heroes who can cope with marginality and systematic neglect without it having any impact on their performance. If there are costs they are to be carried by the individual, in terms of deteriorating health, fractured relationships and truncated careers. The representatives who conclude deals on which our corporate future depends appear to operate on the corporate dark side. Leave them there and we can also ignore complex issues such as corporate ethics and accountability that are associated with the negotiating process. Alternatively because negotiating is an occasional business activity for all of us we should operate on a “don’t ask don’t tell” policy!

Prepare to meet your partner
Cori Gorman, Cammie Edwards, Robert Meister, DNA Gateway

More and more collaborations are born from partnering meetings, but the size and hectic pace of these events can be overwhelming. To make the most of your time, go in prepared.

Back to top

Order this Issue

euroflag
European Pharma Licensing

Home

European Pharma Licensing Symposium
Budapest 2012

IPLS Xth Meeting
Barcelona 2011

Business Development and Licensing Journal

Euro Council

Events

Past Events

International PLGs

Job Opportunities

Training

Contact EPLC